Legal Opinion

Holland v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided March 21, 1990No. 05-89-00636-CRPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WHITHAM, Justice.

Appellant appeals a conviction for possession of cocaine. In his first point of error, appellant contends that the trial court erred in denying appellant’s motion to suppress. We agree. Accordingly, we reverse and remand.

On January 7, 1989, Officer Javier Leal and his partner were dispatched to 435 Wheatland, apartment 1088, Dallas, Texas. Upon arrival, Officer Leal observed several children outside the door of the apartment. The children were highly upset, screaming “he hit me” or “he has got a hammer.” Leal identified one of the children as a resident of the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
  3. Lowery v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
  4. Sheffield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  5. McKenna v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Dyar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
  2. Rosalez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1993
  3. Flores v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1995
  4. Crowley v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1992
  5. United States v. ThomasDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1992

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API