Tillman v. Fickencher
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
EGAN, District Judge.
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 36, 28 U.S.C., the plaintiff has requested the defendants to admit the truth of some eighteen statements of fact. The defendants have admitted the truth of two of the statements and have objected to the others on the ground that they concern controversial issues of fact which are to be determined by the jury. Counsel submitted briefs and made oral argument on these objections.
Although there are cases to the contrary,1 this Court is of the opinion that the better rule is that the fact that admissions concern controversial issues…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Dulansky v. Iowa-Illinois Gas & Electric Co.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1950
- Jones v. Boyd Truck Lines, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1951
- Demmert v. DemmertDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1953
- People of California v. The Steamship Jules FribourgDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1955
- Electric Furnace Co. v. Fire Ass'n of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1949
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- McGonigle v. BaxterDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961