Legal Opinion

Tillman v. Fickencher

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 31, 1960No. Civ. A. No. 20729PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

EGAN, District Judge.

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 36, 28 U.S.C., the plaintiff has requested the defendants to admit the truth of some eighteen statements of fact. The defendants have admitted the truth of two of the statements and have objected to the others on the ground that they concern controversial issues of fact which are to be determined by the jury. Counsel submitted briefs and made oral argument on these objections.

Although there are cases to the contrary,1 this Court is of the opinion that the better rule is that the fact that admissions concern controversial issues…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dulansky v. Iowa-Illinois Gas & Electric Co.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1950
  2. Jones v. Boyd Truck Lines, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1951
  3. Demmert v. DemmertDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1953
  4. People of California v. The Steamship Jules FribourgDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1955
  5. Electric Furnace Co. v. Fire Ass'n of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1949

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McGonigle v. BaxterDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API