Legal Opinion

Baker v. Quality Correctional Care

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided March 14, 2025No. 1:24-cv-00557Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA FORT WAYNE DIVISION DERRICK D. BAKER, Plaintiff, v. CAUSE NO. 1:24-CV-557-JD-JEM QUALITY CORRECTIONAL CARE, NURSE MICHAEL, NURSE BRANDY, NURSING STAFF, JANE DOE, JANE DOE, and JANE DOE, Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER Derrick D. Baker, a prisoner without a lawyer, filed a complaint. ECF 1. “A document filed pro se is to be liberally construed, and a pro se complaint, however inartfully pleaded, must be held to less stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers.” Erickson v. Pardus,

551 U.S. 89, 94

(2007) (quotation marks and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Kingsley v. HendricksonSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  3. Tyrone Petties v. Imhotep CarterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  4. Alfredo Miranda v. County of LakeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  5. Mhammad Abu-Shawish v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API