Legal Opinion

Messa v. Rubin

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 16, 1995No. Civ. A. 95-4409PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

LOUIS H. POLLAK, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Rusbeiro Messa, has filed a pro se complaint seeking damages under a number of federal and state-law claims, and has filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Messa asserts that his debts substantially exceed his assets, and that his income is very small; because there is no reason not to believe these claims, his motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. However, as noted in this court’s memorandum dismissing another action by Messa, the statute granting courts the power to allow plaintiffs to proceed in forma pauperis, 28 U.S.C.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Carden v. Arkoma AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Molinaro v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Toth v. Bristol TownshipDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Wilson v. O'HairDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API