Legal Opinion · Dissent

Homayouni v. Paribas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 17, 1997Published

1DissentEllerin, J.

I would affirm the granting of partial summary judgment to the plaintiff.

The agreement between these parties is limited to the terms expressed in the final letter sent by defendant’s counsel, which unambiguously stated that defendant would pay plaintiff’s “reasonable legal expenses * * * in pressing her claim against Morgan Manhattan [Morgan]”, which had allegedly lost or damaged certain of plaintiffs belongings during her move to Paris to commence employment with defendant. The IAS Court properly found that parol evidence was inadmissible, since the agreement set forth in the letter, albeit…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Thomas v. . ScuttNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Namad v. Salomon Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. El Reda v. Love Taxi, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API