Ham v. South Carolina
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the Court 1
409 U.S. 524 (1973)
HAM
v.
SOUTH CAROLINA.
No. 71-5139.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued November 6, 1972.
Decided January 17, 1973.
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH CAROLINA.
Jonathan Shapiro argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Jack Greenberg, James M. Nabrit III, and Anthony G. Amsterdam.
Timothy G. Quinn, Assistant Attorney General of South Carolina, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Daniel R. McLeod, Attorney General.
2Opinion of the Court · RehnquistJustice Rehnquist
Petitioner was convicted in the South Carolina trial court of the possession of marihuana in violation of state law.[1]…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Douglas; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Marshall.
3Cases cited24 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.