Jessla Construction Corp. v. Miami-Dade County School Board
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
Jessla Construction Corp. (“Jessla”) appeals from a final judgment awarding attorney’s fees and reasonable costs to Miami-Dade County School Board (“School Board”), pursuant to section 768.79, Florida Statutes (2008), and Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.442. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.
In 2001, Jessla filed a wrongful termination claim against the School Board. On March 21, 2008, the School Board served Jessla with its Offer of Judgment and Proposal for Settlement (“Proposal”), pursuant to section 768.79 and rule 1.442. The Proposal provides in pertinent part:
1. This Proposal…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- CAREY-ALL TRANSPORT, INC. v. NewbyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
- BD. OF TRUSTEES OF FL. ATL. UNIV. v. BowmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Miami-Dade County v. FerrerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Shelton v. WAL-MART LOUISIANA, LLCLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
3Cited by7 opinions
- Alamo Financing, L.P. v. MazoffDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- Michele K. Feinzig, P.A. v. Deehl & Carlson, P.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
- AMERICAN INTEGRITY INSURANCE CO. OF FLORIDA v. MARJORIE BRANFORDDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2021
- Diecidue v. LewisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- Diecidue v. LewisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.