Legal Opinion

Smith v. City of Atlanta

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 22, 1893PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Complaint for damages. Before Judge Westmoreland. City court of Atlanta. October term, 1892,

1Opinion of the Court

Lumpkin, Justice.

The constitution provides that: “Private property shall not be taken, or damaged, for public purposes, without just and adequate compensation being first paid.” Code, §5024. It appeared in the present case that the city constructed through the property of the plaintiffs a permanent public sewer. This could not possibly be done without taking and appropriating a portion of the property itself. Land has “in its legal significance, an indefinite extent, upwards as well as downwards; . . . whatever is in a direct line between the surface of any land and the centre of the earth,…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lovett v. West Va. Central Gas Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Campbell v. Flying V Cattle Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1923
  3. DeKalb County v. DanielsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  4. City of Atlanta v. Hunnicutt & PayneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  5. DeKalb County v. DanielsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API