Legal Opinion

Rubio v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 12, 1992No. 2-91-283-CRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CORRECTED OPINION

MEYERS, Justice.

Pursuant to our plenary power, on the Court’s own motion we withdraw our prior opinion dated September 23, 1992. See Mapco, Inc. v. Forrest, 795 S.W.2d 700, 702 (Tex.1990); Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.218 (Vernon 1988). This opinion is substituted merely to clarify footnote one and is in all other matters identical to our opinion of September 28, 1992.

Appellant, Rolando Rubio, was charged with official oppression to which he pled guilty pursuant to a plea bargain. On April 15, 1991, he received deferred adjudication probation for one year. Appellant filed a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mapco, Inc. v. ForrestTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Dillehey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  3. McDougal v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  4. Kite v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1990
  5. Helmle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Carreon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
  2. Christopher Case v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2003
  3. Christopher Case v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API