Legal Opinion
United States v. Schmitt
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided January 23, 2002No. Docket No. 00-6063PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY ORDER
UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of *65March 31, 1998 be, and it hereby is, AFFIRMED.
The defendants Adam and John Schmitt doing business as Channel Marine Suzuki, Schmitt’s Marina, and Adams Fishing Station (collective!y “the Schmitts” or “the defendants”) appeal from a March 31, 1998 judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Arthur D. Spatt, Judge), holding that they violated the Rivers and Harbors Appropriation Act, 33 U.S.C. § 403 et seq., violated the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 11 et…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- U.S. Titan, Inc. v. Guangzhou Zhen Hua Shipping Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
3Cited by5 opinions
- Nasso v. Bio Reference Laboratories, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2012
- United States v. Theodore AngellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- City of New York v. SchmittAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Crews v. The County of NassauDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2019
- Schmitt v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008