Legal Opinion · Dissent

Beeler v. Jewell (In re Stanton)

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 9, 2002No. Nos. 00-35474, 00-35518Published

1DissentGould, Circuit Judge

I would reverse the decision of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (“BAP”) and reinstate the bankruptcy court’s order granting summary judgment to the trustee. The majority errs by misinterpreting Washington hen law and then misapplying federal bankruptcy law based on its erroneous interpretation of Washington law. Based on my view of applicable law, I regret I cannot join my colleagues, and instead I respectfully dissent from the majority’s opinion.

I

Kevin and Maryann Stanton (“debtors”) owned all the shares of a business called Fleet Manufacturing (“Fleet”), which was organized as a closely held…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In Re: Russell Schwartz Linda Schwartz, Debtors. Russell Schwartz Linda Schwartz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  2. National Bank v. Equity InvestorsWashington Supreme Court · 1973
  3. In Re: Bishweshwar Rai MAHENDRA, Debtor, Eric J. SNYDER, Creditor—Appellant, v. A. Thomas DEWOSKIN, Trustee—AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  4. Equibank, N.A. And the Farmers' Home Administration v. Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  5. In Re: James Delbert McConville Debtor. Tevis T. Thompson, Jr., Trustee v. David Margen Lawton AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API