Legal Opinion

Hill v. Scartascini

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided September 6, 2000No. 1997, Sept. Term, 1999PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHEN P. JOHNSON, Judge,

Specially Assigned.

“Zero is neither negative nor positive, but the narrowest of no-man’s land between these two kingdoms.” 1 And in some situations, such as this, it is more than just a placeholder; it can be an inaccurate and significant misrepresentation of reality.

This appeal addresses what judgment should be entered when a jury award is less than a settlement payment by a joint tort-feasor pursuant to the Maryland Uniform Contribution Among Joint Tort-Feasors’ Act. Tina Hill, appellant and the plaintiff below, brings this appeal from a post-trial Order by the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Attorney General v. Anne Arundel County School Bus Contractors Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  2. Martinez v. LopezCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  3. Keene Corp. v. LevinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  4. Williams v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  5. Williams v. WilliamsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1985

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. FURDA v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  2. Albert S. v. Department of Health & Mental HygieneCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  3. Floyd v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  4. Eller Media Co. v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API