State ex rel. Attorney General v. Board of Commissioners
Supreme Court of Kansas
Original Proceedings in Quo Warranto. This action was commenced May 12th, 1873. The petition was entitled, The State of Kansas upon the relation of the Attorney-General, plaintiff, against The Board of County Commissioners of the County of Ford, James Hanrahan, Charles Bath, J. G. McDonald, and Herman J. Fringer, defendants.
Read the full summary
Original Proceedings in Quo Warranto. This action was commenced May 12th, 1873. The petition was entitled, The State of Kansas upon the relation of the Attorney-General, plaintiff, against The Board of County Commissioners of the County of Ford, James Hanrahan, Charles Bath, J. G. McDonald, and Herman J. Fringer, defendants. The case is like that of the same plaintiff against Commissioners of Pawnee County, supra, 426; and the averments of the petition and answer are almost identical with the averments of the petition and answer in that case. In this case, as in that, the plaintiff demurred…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Valentine, J.:
This case is in some respects very much like the case of The State v. Pawnee County, just decided; (supra, pp. 426, 437.) It is an original proceeding in this court in the nature of quo warranto.' The questions involved in this case, as in the Pawnee county case, are raised on petition, answer, and demurrer to the answer. We shall discuss only such of the questions involved in this case as differ from those discussed in the Pawnee county case, and such only as are necessary to be considered in the decision of this case. The plaintiff has…
2Cited by13 opinions
- State ex rel. Donaldson v. HinesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
- Attorney General v. City of MethuenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- Martin v. InghamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
- In re GunnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
- State ex rel. Connaughton v. HolcombSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.