Legal Opinion
State v. Gradzik
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 24, 1984No. 11434PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtParskey, J.
After a jury trial, the defendant was convicted of burglary in the third degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-103 and was sentenced to a term of imprisonment of not less than two and one-half years nor more than five years. In this appeal from that conviction the defendant claims that: (1) there was insufficient evidence for the jury to find that the defendant had entered the building and hence the trial court erred in denying the defendant’s motion for judgment of acquittal; (2) the trial court’s instructions to the jury regarding the lack of an eyewitness to the alleged entry…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Lynch v. OverholserSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. James Edwards AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- State v. HamptonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- State v. SantangeloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. FullwoodSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Safford v. Warden, State PrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- State v. D'AntonioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.