Legal Opinion

O'Brien v. Office of the Director of Regulation

Mohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court

Decided February 25, 2000No. GDTC-AA-99-110PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WILSON, Judge.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff Charles O’Brien from a final decision of the Office of the Director of Regulation, the Director of Regulation (“Director”) revoking the plaintiffs gaming license. The plaintiff claims aggrievement in that he “was terminated due to arrest that has since been nolled.” (Appeal p. 2) The appeal is taken pursuant to Mohegan Tribal Ordinance (MTO) 95-6.

I. JURISDICTION

MTO 95-6 contains several provisions relevant to this appeal. Sec. 1(a) provides that the “Agency” includes the Office of the Director of Regulation as set forth in MTO 95-2; (b)…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bialowas v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
  2. Department of Public Safety v. Freedom of Information CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pennella v. Office of the Director of RegulationMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API