Alexander v. Gurm Transport Incorporated
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 David Alexander, No. CV-19-08249-PCT-GMS 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Gurm Transport Incorporated, et al., 13 Defendants, 14 and 15 United Specialty Insurance Company, 16 Intervenor. 17 18 Pending before the Court is United Specialty Insurance Company (“Intervenor”)’s 19 Motion to Intervene pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 24(a) (Doc. 12) and Answer/Motion to 20 Dismiss in Intervention (Doc. 12 at 5). The Motion to Intervene is granted and Intervenor 21 is directed to file its Answer on Behalf of Defendant…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Day v. ApolionaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way EmployeesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- Mora v. Phoenix Indemnity InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999