Legal Opinion

Warner v. Bullen

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 25, 1905No. Gen. No. 4,499PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Bill to charge a legacy upon real estate. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Rock Island County; the Hon. Emery C. Grates, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dibell

The last will of Wilder W. Warner, duly probated, contained eighteen paragraphs, the seventh of which was as follows: “ I give, devise and bequeath to my son, Wilmot 8. Warner ” (describing a half lot in Moline) “ provided he pays to Mrs. Lillian Drury, wife of A: R. Drury, the sum of five hundred dollars, this being the total of my bequest to him.” There was no other mention of Wilmot Warner or Mrs. Drury in. the will. Wilmot refused to accept the devise, and other children took the lot under a residuary clause. Mrs. Drury assigned her interest to Henry L. Bullen. By an amended bill against…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Fish v. HowlandNew York Court of Chancery · 1828
  2. Brown v. . KnappNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  3. Harris v. FlyNew York Court of Chancery · 1839
  4. Lindsey v. LindseyIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Parsons v. MillarIllinois Supreme Court · 1901

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kakuska v. RoubykAppellate Court of Illinois · 1910
  2. Jaeger v. SteinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API