Duran v. New Jersey Zinc Company
New Mexico Supreme Court
1DissentOman, Justice
As shown by the majority opinion and the opinion of the Court of Appeals, the decisive question is when it became reasonably apparent, or should have become reasonably apparent, to plaintiff that he was unable to some percentage-extent to perform the usual tasks in the work he was performing at the time of his injury and was unable to some percentage-extent to perform any work for which he is fitted by age, education, training, general physical and mental capacity and previous work experience.
He had been employed by defendant for a total of 22 years. His duties in this" employment, as well as…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- De Vas v. NobleUtah Supreme Court · 1962
- Carter v. WinterIllinois Supreme Court · 1965
- McNish v. General Credit CorporationNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
- Bockman v. Mitchell Bros. Truck LinesOregon Supreme Court · 1958
- Ford v. RobinsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1957
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.