Legal Opinion
Clay v. PEPPER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided November 2, 1990No. 1-89-3208, 1-89-3226 consPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Murray
Various defendants appeal from a trial court’s order in a one-count Structural Work Act case. (111. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch. 48, pars. 60 through 69.) The appealing parties are defendants Hans Rosenow Roofing Co., Inc. (Rosenow), Pepper Construction Company (Pepper), and Lake Specialties, Inc. (Lake Specialties). The fourth defendant, Division Eight, Inc. (Division Eight), did not appeal and defends on appeal. The fifth defendant, Lake County Glass Co., Inc., and the plaintiff, Richard C. Clay (Clay), do not appeal and have not appeared in this appeal.
For the following reasons we affirm the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Laue v. LeifheitIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
- Pell v. Victor J. Andrew High SchoolAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
- Tisoncik v. SzczepankiewiczAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
- Edwards v. City of QuincyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
- St. Mary of Nazareth Hospital v. KuczajAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Cianci v. Safeco Ins. Co. of IllinoisAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
- Stickler v. American Augers, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1999
- Carter v. KirkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
- Koller v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994
- Allstate Contractors, Inc. v. Marriott Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.