Legal Opinion

Gordon v. Weinreb

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 26, 1935PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*836The opinion of the court was delivered by

Perskie, J.

The basic question requiring decision in this ease is—did the trial judge correctly apply the doctrine or maxim of res ipsa loquitur ?

Plaintiff, while in defendant’s drug store, was invited by the latter to the rear part of the store where he was compounding prescriptions. Plaintiff, while engaged in conversation with the defendant, was hit on the head by a falling-box of soap, weighing about thirty-five or forty pounds, which fell from a shelf on which it was piled, about eighteen feet above the store floor. Merchandise had been removed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hughes v. Atlantic City & Shore RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1914
  2. Smith v. KirbySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
  3. Law v. MorrisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1926
  4. Sheridan v. FoleySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1895
  5. Day v. DonohueSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1898

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cleary v. City of CamdenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1937
  2. Francois v. American Stores Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  3. Galbraith v. SmithSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1938
  4. Klatt v. Hoboken Bank for SavingsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1941
  5. Titone v. Economy BooterySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API