Legal Opinion

Estate of Tyler S. Rushing v. AG Private Protection, Inc.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided May 20, 2020No. 2:18-cv-01692Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 ESTATE OF TYLER S. RUSHING, No. 2:18-cv-01692-MCE-AC et al., 11 Plaintiffs, 12 ORDER v. 13 AG PRIVATE PROTECTION, INC., 14 et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 By way of this action, Plaintiffs seek to recover for injuries sustained as a result of 18 a fatal altercation between Tyler S. Rushing (“Decedent”) and various named 19 Defendants, which include employees of a private security firm as well as members of 20 the Chico Police Department and the Butte County Sheriff’s Office (generally referred to 21 as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Tommy Martin, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  2. Maraziti v. ThorpeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  3. Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe of Indians v. HodelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  4. Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API