Legal Opinion

Keller v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1990No. 49S00-8906-TA-450PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPARD, Chief Justice.

The State of Indiana seeks dismissal of this appeal on the grounds that appellant’s counsel has not provided sufficient citation to authority to permit proper review of the legal claims appellant presents. We agree and dismiss in accordance with Ind.Appellate Rule 8.3(A)(7).

Appellant Teresa I. Keller owned and operated “Barbie’s Rubdown” in Danville. Customers of “Barbie’s” received services in private rooms from female employees, who then collected a fee for their services. The amount of the fee depended partially upon the presence or absence of the employee’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. St. John v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Reed v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Keller v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Tax Court · 1988
  4. Stroud v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Rhodes v. PiperIndiana Supreme Court · 1873

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. StevensonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Young v. ButtsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Abbott v. BatesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Sword v. SweetIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Indiana Limestone Co. v. StaggsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API