Legal Opinion
State v. Morrison
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided June 1, 1976No. C 75-07-2180 Cr, CA 5435PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLangtry, J.
Defendant was convicted on jury trial of being an ex-felon in possession of a concealable firearm (ORS 166.270) and "carrying” a stiletto in violation of ORS 166.510.
He challenges the first count conviction on grounds of what he claims was an illegal search. We have determined this claim to be baseless, and unnecessary of opinion.
He challenges the second count conviction on the ground that he was not "carrying” the stiletto. The pertinent part of ORS 166.510(1) provides:
«* * * [A]ny person who * * * carries a dirk, dagger or stiletto commits a Class A misdemeanor.”
The defendant was stopped as…
2Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. John Leonard Rousseau, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- State v. WilliamsUtah Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. CrumalCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
- United States v. John Leonard Rousseau, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001