Legal Opinion

Mariness v. Sirilo

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 27, 1974No. 73-965PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOANOS, JAMES E., Associate Judge.

The parties were first married in 1939 and purchased the real property in question in 1952. They were divorced in 1961. At the time of the divorce, there was no property settlement regarding the subject property, therefore, the parties become tenants-in-common. The parties remarried each other on June 9, 1972.

On July 27, 1972, the parties became separated. On August 7, 1972, the parties met and discussed the subject property. Appel-lee, Rudolph T. Sirilo, hereinafter referred to as “husband”, gave appellant, Alice M. Sirilo (now Alice M. Sirilo Mariness)…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Finston v. FinstonSupreme Court of Florida · 1948
  2. Hedges v. LysekSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
  3. Durham v. EllisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Diejuste v. DavisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  2. Wooten v. RhodusDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  3. Wooten v. RhodusDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API