Legal Opinion

Hampden National Bank v. Hampden Railroad

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 10, 1923PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBraley, J.

The material facts are not in issue. It appears that the Cambridge Savings Bank, a creditor of the railroad, attached its property on mesne process February 21, 1921, and the action is now pending in the Superior Court. *406The Hampden National Bank, a simple contract creditor, acting in its own behalf and in behalf of all other creditors who might join, brought on March 16,1921, a bill in equity in that court alleging that the railroad was not being operated, and that it had obligations in the form of overdue promissory notes amounting to $1,500,000; that the Cambridge Savings Bank had attached…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Pusey & Jones Co. v. HanssenSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Sage v. Memphis & Little Rock RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Paige v. SinclairMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  4. Loaiza v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Richardson v. Clinton Wall Trunk Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. New England Theatres, Inc. v. Olympia Theatres, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  2. Rossi v. Colorado Pulp & Paper Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1931
  3. New England Oil Refining Co. v. Canada Mexico Oil Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  4. Kahler v. Town of MarshfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
  5. Mueller v. Commissioner of Public HealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API