City of Fort Smith v. McCutchen
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Donald L. Corbin, Justice.
Appellant City of Fort Smith, Arkansas, appeals the Sebastian County Circuit Court’s order granting Appellee Dan McCutchen a variance from a setback requirement contained in the Fort Smith City Ordinances. On appeal, Fort Smith argues that Ark. Code Ann. § 14-56-425 (Repl. 1998) is unconstitutional because it permits a de novo trial on appeal of a legislative determination made by a city Board of Zoning Adjustment (BZA). Accordingly, our jurisdiction is pursuant to Ark. Sup. Ct. R. l-2(a)(l). We find no error and affirm.
McCutchen owns real property in Fort Smith,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- City of Lowell v. M & N Mobile Home Park, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- Cochran v. BentleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
- Beverly Enterprises - Arkansas, Inc. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
- Night Clubs, Inc. v. Fort Smith Planning CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
- Tomerlin v. NickolichSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Best Buy Stores, L.P. v. Benderson-Wainberg Associates, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- Ludwig v. Bella Casa, LLCSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010
- Greenwood v. AndersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
- Sullins v. Central Arkansas WaterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015
- McCourt Manufacturing Corp. v. RycroftSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.