Legal Opinion

City of Fort Smith v. McCutchen

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 6, 2008No. 07-864PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Donald L. Corbin, Justice.

Appellant City of Fort Smith, Arkansas, appeals the Sebastian County Circuit Court’s order granting Appellee Dan McCutchen a variance from a setback requirement contained in the Fort Smith City Ordinances. On appeal, Fort Smith argues that Ark. Code Ann. § 14-56-425 (Repl. 1998) is unconstitutional because it permits a de novo trial on appeal of a legislative determination made by a city Board of Zoning Adjustment (BZA). Accordingly, our jurisdiction is pursuant to Ark. Sup. Ct. R. l-2(a)(l). We find no error and affirm.

McCutchen owns real property in Fort Smith,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. City of Lowell v. M & N Mobile Home Park, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  2. Cochran v. BentleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  3. Beverly Enterprises - Arkansas, Inc. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  4. Night Clubs, Inc. v. Fort Smith Planning CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  5. Tomerlin v. NickolichSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Best Buy Stores, L.P. v. Benderson-Wainberg Associates, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
  2. Ludwig v. Bella Casa, LLCSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010
  3. Greenwood v. AndersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
  4. Sullins v. Central Arkansas WaterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015
  5. McCourt Manufacturing Corp. v. RycroftSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API