Legal Opinion

Fisher v. Larick

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 16, 1817PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In Error. ERROR.to the Common Pleas of Union county. This case was argued by Bellas and Fisher, for the plaintiffs in error, and Hall and Watts, for the defendants in error.

1Opinion of the Court

Tilghman C. T.

Elizabeth Larick and others, plaintiffs below, claimed under a warrant to William Gill, dated 12th June, 1772, “for 300 acres, adjoining the lower line of An- “ drew Allen's survey,” &c. They gave evidence, tending to prove, that Gill had commenced an improvement, a short time before the date of his warrant, that the warrant was, very soon after its date, put into the hands of William Ma-clay, deputy surveyor, in order that a survey might be made thereon, and.that a dispute having arisen between the said Gill, and John Lee, the owner of a location, dated 3d April, 1769, who…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lessee of Billington v. WelshSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1812

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Boyles v. KellySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1823
  2. Chambers v. MifflinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1829

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API