Chewning v. Clarendon County
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1DissentJustice Cothran
(dissenting) : This is an action under Section 2948 of the Code of 1922 (as amended by Act April 14, 1925 [34 St. at Large, p. 287]), and Section 2950, for damages on account of the alleged wrongful death of the plaintiffs intestate, John H. Chewning, her husband, resulting from the breaking in of a bridge of the-county over which intestate was driving a tractor owned by the county and operated by the intestate as an employee of the county and under the direction of a superior officer.
The complaint alleges that the collapse of the bridge was due to the defective condition of the timbers and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Chicago & Alton Railroad v. Margaret HouseIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
- Faust v. Richland CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1921
- Dunn v. Town of BarnwellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1895
- Commonwealth v. AllenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
- Mullinax v. HambrightSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1920
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.