Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Quinn v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided August 31, 1976No. 8 Div. 797Published

1ConcurrenceCates, Presiding Judge

Here the baby sitter opened the door beguiled by a felonious ruse. To me this way of getting in falls under constructive breaking. See iv Bl. Com. 226(h).

Thus at Common Law “breaking” included fraud to secure entry — though not attempts thereat. Consent to enter got by a trick is no consent at all. State v. Pierce, 14 Utah 2d 177, 380 P.2d 725; State v. Keys, 244 Or. 606, 419 P.2d 943.1

Our Code (T. 14, § 85) still requires proof of breaking though modern statutes tend to delete it as an element of burglary. See State v. McKinney, Or.App., 535 P.2d 1392; also Ala.Law Inst. proposed revised…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. KeysOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  2. State v. PierceUtah Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Hulbert v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  4. State v. McKinneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API