Legal Opinion

Pearson v. Wallace

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1918No. Docket No. 35PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Livingston; Miner, J. Case by George J. Pearson against Henry M. Wallace and others for fraud and deceit. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, C. J.

Plaintiff owned a farm of 120 acres in the township of Hamburg, Livingston county, which, in December, 1915, he conveyed by warranty deed to defendant George Gallup, for a recited consideration of $5,650. What plaintiff received for the land, was eleven bonds, issued by the Iron Mountain *624Light & Fuel Company, for $500 each, the sum of $150 being paid as a commission to the agent, defendant Whaley, who made the sale. Defendant Gallup soon mortgaged the land, but held the title for about a year, when he conveyed it to another. The Iron Mountain Light & Fuel Company is a Michigan corporation,…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Barry v. LeglerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
  2. New Jersey Title Guarantee & Trust Co. v. McGrathMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Pearson v. WallaceMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Lund v. StarzMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  5. People v. LarsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API