Legal Opinion
People v. Greenberg
New York Court of Appeals
Decided June 25, 2013PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*446OPINION OF THE COURT
Smith, J.
We hold that the Attorney General’s claims against two former officers of American International Group, Inc. (AIG) have sufficient support in the record to withstand summary judgment.
The Attorney General began this civil suit against AIG, Maurice Greenberg and Howard Smith in 2005. Until shortly before the suit was brought, Greenberg was the chief executive officer, and Smith the chief financial officer, of AIG. AIG has settled the case; Greenberg and Smith remain as defendants.
The Attorney General alleges that Greenberg and Smith violated section 63 (12) of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. FergusonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Seitelman v. LavineNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. GreenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Couch v. PeralesNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- In re American International Group, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
3Cited by18 opinions
- Greenberg v. SpitzerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- People v. Credit Suisse Sec.New York Court of Appeals · 2018
- Bank of N.Y. Mellon v. GordonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
- People v. AllenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- The People of the State of New York by Eric T. Schneiderman v. Maurice R. GreenbergNew York Court of Appeals · 2016
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.