Legal Opinion

Longshore v. Hayden

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 24, 1929No. 6 Div. 163PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSayre, J.

The averment of the bill is that.the parties “by verbal agreement formed themselves into a copartnership * . *. * as follows: Complainant and defendant agreed to become equal partners in a firm to be known and designated as Longshore and Hayden, * * * to act as fiscal agent and to sell twenty thousand shares of the capital stock of the State Savings and Loan Company, a corporation.” Appellant appears in the brief to construe this and other language of the bill of complaint — nothing, however, to the contrary of this — as capable of the construction that there was no perfected, agreement for a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Holmes v. HuntMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
  2. Dugger v. TutwilerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
  3. Treadaway v. StansellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Turner v. RaineySupreme Court of Alabama · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API