Legal Opinion

Tate v. Shober

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 20, 1943No. 1373Published

1Opinion of the Court

BARD, District Judge.

This is an action for damages for breach of an alleged oral agreement by the defendant to pay $5,000 for an assignment of five exclusive agency contracts for the sale of coal. I make the following special

Findings of Fact.

1. Plaintiff Tate is a citizen of Ohio; plaintiff Wattles is a citizen of New York; plaintiff Continental Collieries, Incorporated, is a corporation incorporated under the laws of Delaware; defendant is a citizen of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania; and the matter in controversy exceeds, exclusive of interest and costs, the sum of $3,000.

2. In and prior…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Continental Collieries, Inc. v. ShoberCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  2. Tate v. ShoberDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API