Diehl v. Moore
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ON MOTION FOR CORRECTION
2Per curiam
We grant appellee’s motion for correction, withdraw our opinion filed August 9, 2000, and issue this corrected opinion in its stead.
Joseph Diehl appeals an order denying his petition for writ of mandamus, wherein he requested the lower court to order ap-pellee, the Department of Corrections, pursuant to Lynce v. Mathis, 519 U.S. 433, 117 S.Ct. 891, 137 L.Ed.2d 63 (1997), to restore administrative gaintime and provisional credits that had been canceled under section 944.277, Florida Statutes (Supp.1992), Florida Attorney General Opinion 92-96 (1992), and section…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Lynce v. MathisSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Holcomb v. Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- Meola v. Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
- Roberts v. BriertonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
4Cited by1 opinion
- STATE OF FLORIDA vs CILVIS C. WOODSONDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2022