Legal Opinion

Nelson v. Keisling

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1992No. SC S39184PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarson, C. J.

In this original proceeding, petitioner challenges the ballot title for a proposed initiative measure. Petitioner is an elector who timely submitted written comments on the Attorney General’s draft ballot title. Therefore, he is entitled to petition this court seeking a different title. ORS 250.085(2). Oregon Health Initiative, represented by intervenors Lowe, Stevens, and Graham, is a proponent of the measure, as is Oregonians for Health Care, represented by its director, intervenor Carlson. Intervenors are interested parties granted leave to intervene by this court under ORAP 11.30(8).

The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Deras v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Deras v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  3. McCain v. KeislingOregon Supreme Court · 1992

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mabon v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Mabon v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API