Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. MacK

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 23, 1974No. Appeal, 20PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Van dee Vooet, J.,

On October 2,1973, the Appellant, Daniel Nathaniel Mack, Jr. entered a plea of guilty to a charge of Bobbery with Accomplice by Violence. He claims that the guilty plea colloquy was deficient in two particulars:(1) There is allegedly no showing that defendant understood the nature and elements of the charge to which he pled guilty; and(2) There is allegedly no showing that the defendant understood that he was presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

In making both claims, appellant relies on Commonwealth v. Ingram, 455 Pa. 198, 316 A. 2d 77…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. IngramSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. West v. RundleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Commonwealth v. MaddoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Commonwealth v. JacksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Commonwealth v. CampbellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MacKSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Commonwealth v. MinorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Commonwealth v. MacKSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Commonwealth v. MinorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API