Commonwealth v. MacK
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Van dee Vooet, J.,
On October 2,1973, the Appellant, Daniel Nathaniel Mack, Jr. entered a plea of guilty to a charge of Bobbery with Accomplice by Violence. He claims that the guilty plea colloquy was deficient in two particulars:(1) There is allegedly no showing that defendant understood the nature and elements of the charge to which he pled guilty; and(2) There is allegedly no showing that the defendant understood that he was presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
In making both claims, appellant relies on Commonwealth v. Ingram, 455 Pa. 198, 316 A. 2d 77…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Commonwealth v. IngramSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. West v. RundleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Commonwealth v. MaddoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Commonwealth v. JacksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Commonwealth v. CampbellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MacKSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. MinorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. MacKSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. MinorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.