Legal Opinion
James F. Adams v. Thiokol Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided October 25, 2000No. 99-11734PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
HARLINGTON WOOD, Jr., Circuit Judge:
Plaintiffs, 301 former employees of Thiokol Corporation 1 (“Thiokol”), brought an action against Thiokol, the Thiokol Corporation Employee Separation Pay Plan (the “Plan”), and Richard T. Smith, Administrator of the Plan (collectively referred to as the “Defendants”), seeking severance pay pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. The district court granted Defendants’ motion for summary judgment and dismissed Plaintiffs’ claims. Plaintiffs timely filed this appeal. We affirm in part and reverse and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Fred Brown v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- Hurt v. Leatherby Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1980
- Joe Rodger Newell, Jr., Individually and as Natural Parent and Guardian of Minor Joe Rodger Newell, Iii. v. Prudential Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Adams v. Thiokol CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000