Leyva v. National Default Servicing Corp.
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Hardesty, J.:
In this appeal, we consider issues arising out of Nevada’s Foreclosure Mediation Program. First, we must determine whether a homeowner who is not the original mortgagor is a proper party to participate in the program. We conclude that the Foreclosure Mediation statute, NRS 107.086, and the Foreclosure Mediation Rules (FMRs) dictate that a homeowner, even if he or she is not the named mortgagor, is a proper party entitled to request mediation following a notice of default.
Second, we must determine if a party is considered to have complied with the applicable…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Veal v. American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc. (In Re Veal)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Leven v. FreyNevada Supreme Court · 2007
- Pasillas v. HSBC BANK USANevada Supreme Court · 2011
- State of Nevada Employees Ass'n v. DainesNevada Supreme Court · 1992
- Ray v. HawkinsNevada Supreme Court · 1960
3Cited by47 opinions
- Edelstein v. Bank of New York MellonNevada Supreme Court · 2012
- Holt v. Regional Trustee Services Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 2011
- Saticoy Bay LLC Series 9050 W Warm Springs 2079 v. Nev. Ass'n Servs.Nevada Supreme Court · 2019
- JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLCDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2016
- Markowitz v. Saxon Special ServicingNevada Supreme Court · 2013
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.