Legal Opinion
Kings 28 Associates v. Raff
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided September 22, 1995PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Marc Finkelstein, J.
In accordance with the decision and order of July 10, 1995, the court indicated that it had two motions before it: (1) pro se motion brought by June Raff, wife of respondent Norman Raff, seeking an extension of time to pay arrears pursuant to stipulations between the parties, due to her husband being totally disabled and Protective Services for Adults (PSA) being involved in her case; (2) order to show cause brought by the Corporation Counsel on behalf of the Department of Social Services/Protective Services for Adults (DSS/PSA) seeking, inter alia,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- 466 Associates v. MurrayCivil Court of the City of New York · 1991
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bowen v. RubinDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2001
- New York Life Insurance v. V.K.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1999
- In re Linden-RathNew York Supreme Court · 2001
- Parras v. RicciardiCivil Court of the City of New York · 2000
- In re an Individual to Change NameCivil Court of the City of New York · 2003