Legal Opinion

Casey v. McIntosh

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 25, 1978No. 77-131PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a boundary line dispute between coterminous landowners involving an area of land approximately 40 feet by 267 feet. The parcel is in a rural part of the county, is wooded, and is not under cultivation. Appellant, who was joined as a plaintiff, claimed the strip by adverse possession. The defendant, Rosa Kraker, based her claim upon a deed from her predecessors in title. The case was heard before a jury, which returned a verdict for the defendant, Kraker. The trial judge denied plaintiff's motion for a new trial. The party joined as a plaintiff appeals. We affirm.

The action was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. S.S. Kresge Co. v. RubySupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  2. Edmondson v. BlakeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  3. Barnett v. MillisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
  4. Butts v. LancasterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
  5. Prestwood v. HuntSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Storey v. PattersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  2. Davis v. TownsendSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  3. Roberts v. MitchellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  4. Darby v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  5. Darby v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API