Casey v. McIntosh
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
This is a boundary line dispute between coterminous landowners involving an area of land approximately 40 feet by 267 feet. The parcel is in a rural part of the county, is wooded, and is not under cultivation. Appellant, who was joined as a plaintiff, claimed the strip by adverse possession. The defendant, Rosa Kraker, based her claim upon a deed from her predecessors in title. The case was heard before a jury, which returned a verdict for the defendant, Kraker. The trial judge denied plaintiff's motion for a new trial. The party joined as a plaintiff appeals. We affirm.
The action was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- S.S. Kresge Co. v. RubySupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
- Edmondson v. BlakeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
- Barnett v. MillisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
- Butts v. LancasterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
- Prestwood v. HuntSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Storey v. PattersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Davis v. TownsendSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Roberts v. MitchellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Darby v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
- Darby v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981