Hodge v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
We affirm the denial of the appellant’s rule 3.800(a) motion challenging his VCC sentences on the ground that the convictions were not sequential, see Bover v. State, 797 So.2d 1246, 1250 (Fla.2001) (stating that under § 775.084(5), “although the sentencing for separate convictions arising out of unrelated crimes can take place on the same day, the sentences cannot be part of the same sentencing proceeding”), as it is not apparent from the face of the record before this Court whether the appellant was sentenced for the predicate convictions at issue during the same sentencing proceeding. Cf.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bover v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
- Poole v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994