Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Ken Isaacs v. Jeff Caldwell Member of Georgetown-Scott County Planning Commission

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 2017No. 2015-SC-000265-DGUnknown

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partWright, J.

I concur with the majority’s excellent analysis and determination that “we regard the summons for the Bank to have been issued contemporaneously with the filing of the appeal before the expiration of the time limitation.” The majority correctly states that good faith requires the party to diligently attend to the service of the summons. However, I disagree that Appellants failed to comply with the “good faith” element. In holding otherwise, both lower courts and the majority all consider the wrong time period. Therefore, I dissent in part.

OR 3.01 requires “the issuance of a summons ... in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rucker's Adm'r v. Roadway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
  2. Title Ins. & Trust Co. v. City of PaducahCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API