Legal Opinion

Cerise v. Fruitvale Water and Sanitation District

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided August 19, 1963No. 20630PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore

We will refer to plaintiffs in error as plaintiffs or by-name. It was alleged in the complaint filed by them that the defendant sanitation district negligently removed a manhole cover from a public thoroughfare and “negligently failed and neglected to warn the plaintiff LeRoy Cerise of said removal and of the open manhole situate at said place, but left said manhole openly exposed in violation of the defendant’s duty * * * and that LeRoy Cerise suffered personal injuries when the automobile he was driving ran into said open manhole. It was further alleged that Juanita Cerise, wife of LeRoy,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. City & County of Denver v. TaylorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1930
  2. City of Denver v. SpencerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1905
  3. City of Denver v. DavisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1906
  4. City of Denver v. CapelliSupreme Court of Colorado · 1877
  5. Schwalb v. ConnelySupreme Court of Colorado · 1947

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Perl-Mack Enterprises Co. v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
  2. City of Colorado Springs v. PowellSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  3. National Food Stores, Inc. v. North Washington Street Water & Sanitation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API