Chicago Portland Cement Co. v. Hofman
Appellate Court of Illinois
Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. McKenzie Cleland, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Duncan
This is an action to recover from defendant in error a balance of $496.20, claimed to be due to plaintiff in error for cement delivered pursuant to a written contract between said parties, dated June 26, 1908. The cause was tried before the court without a jury, resulting in a judgment of $16.20 in favor of plaintiff in error. The cement company prosecutes this writ of error.
It was stipulated by the parties in open court that the balance due to plaintiff in error for cement delivered to defendant in error under the contract was $496.20, subject to the right of the defendant in error to prove…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Donelson v. East St. Louis & Suburban Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1908
- Fuchs & Lang Manufacturing Co. v. R. J. Kittredge & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1909
- Telluride Power Transmission Co. v. Crane Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1904
- Packard v. Van SchoickIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
- Fuchs & Lang Manufacturing Co. v. R. J. Kittredge & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1909
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.