State v. Bacon
Supreme Court of Vermont
Complaint against the respondent for the third offense under section 9 of chapter 94 of the General Statutes relative to the traffic in intoxicating drinks. Plea, not guilty. Trial by the court, October 1867, David Heed, Becorder.
Read the full summary
Complaint against the respondent for the third offense under section 9 of chapter 94 of the General Statutes relative to the traffic in intoxicating drinks. Plea, not guilty. Trial by the court, October 1867, David Heed, Becorder. In this case, before pleading, the respondent requested the court to direct that the prosecution furnish him with a specification which should set forth as follows, to wit: 1st. The number of offenses that the prosecution proposed to-offer evidence of against him. 2d. The nature of said offenses, whether for selling, furnishing, or giving away. 3d. The names of the…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Psout, J.
This case comes into this court from the recorder’s court of the city of Burlington. On the trial in the recorder’s court, the prosecution introduced Josiah Kellogg as a witness, who testified to material facts, and who, during his examination *530in chief, referred to a memorandum for the purpose of refreshing his recollection. On cross-examination he refused to allow the respondent’s counsel to examine it. The recorder was requested to direct the witness to allow it, but he declined, in effect holding that the respondent was not entitled to…
2Cited by17 opinions
- Mathis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1903
- State v. GadwoodSupreme Court of Missouri · 1938
- State v. MagersOregon Supreme Court · 1899
- Lennon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
- Imboden v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1907
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.