Legal Opinion
Padula v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 6, 1965No. Civ. 29444PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRAMPTON, J, pro tern. *
* — Petitioner seeks a writ of prohibition to compel the respondent court to dismiss or abate an action now pending in such court entitled “Brogdex Com pany, a Corporation, Plaintiff, vs. Elmer A. Padula, Doe One to Doe Twenty, inclusive, Defendants, No. 849,345.”
On September 27, 1963, petitioner filed an action against Brogdex in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Tulare, number 59830, entitled “Elmer A. Padula, Plaintiff, vs. Brogdex Co., a corporation; Jack Griggs, Inc., a corporation; and First Doe to Tenth Doe, inclusive, Defendants.” In this…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Browne v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Myers v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Lee v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Slinack v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Robinson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
3Cited by7 opinions
- Sheldon F. Sackett, and Kvan, Inc., a Washington Corporation v. J. Frank Beaman, and Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- Stearns v. Los Angeles City School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- People Ex Rel. Garamendi v. American Autoplan, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1993
- Carey v. CusackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Berg & Berg Enterprises v. City of San Jose CA6California Court of Appeal · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.