Legal Opinion

Little v. Davis

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 9, 1909No. 16,475PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Original proceeding in quo ivarranto.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Porter, J.:

This is an original proceeding in quo warranto, and the question involved arises upon a motion to dismiss.

At the general election in November, 1908, the plaintiff and the defendant were candidates against each other for the office of coroner of Wyandotte county. The official returns showed that the defendant had received twenty-five more votes than the plaintiff, and the canvassing board declared him duly elected. He received the certificate of election, and thereafter qual*778ified and entered upon the duties of the office. Within the time…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Tarbox v. SughrueSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
  2. Smith v. AuldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
  3. State ex rel. Vance v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
  4. Weston v. LaneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
  5. State ex rel. Day v. BucklandSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gas Service Co. v. Consolidated Gas Utilities Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  2. State ex rel. Baird v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  3. State ex rel. Beck v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API