Legal Opinion

Cantrell v. City of Caruthersville

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 12, 1954No. 43978PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN 'OSDOL, Commissioner.

Action for a judgment declaring the rights, status and legal relations of. the parties, Section 527.010 RSMo 1949, V.A. M.S., with respect to tracts of real estate in Caruthersville.

The trial court sustained the motion to abate plaintiffs’ claim and to dismiss filed by defendant-respondent, City of Caruth-ersville. Defendants, The National Bank of Caruthersville and Chris Mehrle, did not appear. Defendant city’s motion stated as grounds therefor, among others, that a former judgment, affirmed in Cantrell v. City of Caruthersville, Mo.Sup., 249 S.W.2d 425, bars the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cantrell v. City of CaruthersvilleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  2. Cantrell v. City of CaruthersvilleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
  3. State Ex Rel. Kansas City Bridge Co. v. TerteSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Jacobs v. LeggettSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  2. Flanary v. RowlettMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Frix v. BeckDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
  4. Barry, Inc. v. FalkMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Ginter v. City of Webster GrovesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1961

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API