Legal Opinion

Murdaugh v. Patterson

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 9, 2014No. SD 32619PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDon E. Burrell, J.

This is an appeal from a declaratory judgment, and it involves a dispute between neighbors about the proper scope of an express ingress-and-egress easement. Norma Patterson and her son, Mark A. Patterson (“Defendants”), appeal the amended judgment (“the Judgment”) that declared the extent of their rights in a 35-foot-wide, deeded easement (“the Easement”) across property owned by David K. Murdaugh and Denise M. Murdaugh, husband and wife (“Plaintiffs”).1

Defendants’ three points claim the trial court committed a total of five reversible errors: 1) “ruling that [Defendants] ‘may’ have the right…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pearson v. KosterSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
  2. Missouri Soybean Ass'n v. Missouri Clean Water CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  3. Schweich v. NixonSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
  4. Missouri Health Care Ass'n v. Attorney GeneralSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  5. Burg v. DampierMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stoesz v. WrightMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. Kallash Revocable Inter Vivos Trust v. Sean T. Fitzsimmons and Stacie S. FitzsimmonsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API