Legal Opinion
In Re Hardy
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 8, 1984No. 19-11645PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EMIL F. GOLDHABER, Bankruptcy Judge:
The question in the controversy at bench is whether the Internal Revenue Service (“the IRS”) should be held in civil contempt for allegedly violating the automatic stay of the Bankruptcy Code (“the Code”) by sending the debtors a notice of tax deficiency and various other documents. For the reasons expressed below we will not hold the IRS in contempt.
The facts of this ease are as follows: 1 The debtors filed a petition for the adjustment of their debts under chapter 13 of the Code on May 4, 1982. At the first meeting of creditors the debtors filed a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re Fidelity Mortgage Investors, Debtor. Fidelity Mortgage Investors, Applicant-Appellee v. Camelia Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Rodney W. Quinter v. Volkswagen of America, Volkswagen of Atlantic, Inc., Volkswagenwerk, A. G., Byron BlochCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Fox v. Capital Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938
- Provident Mutual Life Insurance v. Winslow Center Associates (In Re Winslow Center Associates)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
3Cited by14 opinions
- In Re MacKUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1985
- Curtis R. Richmond Barbara Richmond v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Matter of UngarUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 1989
- In Re H & H Beverage DistributorsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- In Re Augustus Court AssociatesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.